z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐T‐638: Optimization of Prescription Isodose Selection for Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Conventional Linac vs. Cyberknife
Author(s) -
Ding C,
Solberg T,
Timmerman R
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3612601
Subject(s) - cyberknife , linear particle accelerator , imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , radiosurgery , radiation treatment planning , medicine , radiation therapy , line (geometry) , medical physics , beam (structure) , radiology , physics , optics , mathematics , geometry
Purpose: To determine the optimal prescription isodose line that minimizes normal tissue dose for stereotactic irradiation of intracranial targets comparing conventional linear accelerator and robotic (Cyberknife) delivery. Material and Methods: An anthropomorphic head phantom with a centrally located target was scanned using a 16 slice large bore CT simulator. Two concentric 5mm spherical shells of normal tissue, the first from the target surface to 5 mm radically, and the other from 5 mm to 10mm, were identified/contoured around the target. For linac planning, 9 co‐planar, non‐opposing 3D conformal beams were designed for conformal dose delivery. By manipulating the block margin, varying prescription isodose lines were used to cover exactly 95% of tumor. After linac planning, the same CT images and contours were sent to the Cyberknife for treatment planning. Multiple plans were generated with different prescription isodose lines covering exactly 95% of the target. gEUD (generalized effective uniform dose) was used to evaluate normal tissue irradiation within the shells using different parameters for parallel and serial tissues. Results: For linac plans, the results show that the optimal prescription isodose line yielding maximum normal tissue sparing is located between 50%∼60% of the maximum dose when the organ displays parallel behavior. For serially functioning tissues, the optimal prescription isodose line increases to approximately 80%. The gEUD of normal tissue (predisposing to toxicity) increases greatly when prescription isodose lines lower than 50% or higher than 80% are used. For Cyberknife plans, the optimal prescription isodose line lies near 50% for tissue for both either parallel or serial structures. These results are consistent for different tumor sizes. Conclusion: Both conventional linac and robotic delivery provide conformal tumor coverage with excellent normal tissue sparing. To achieve optimal normal tissue sparing, a lower isodose line should be prescribed for Cyberkinfe® than for a conventional linac.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom