z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐T‐82: Position‐Dependent Discrete Point Spread Functions for EPID IMRT QA
Author(s) -
Nichita E,
Ostapiak O,
Farrell T
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3612033
Subject(s) - optics , point spread function , monte carlo method , image guided radiation therapy , physics , position (finance) , superposition principle , medical imaging , mathematics , computer science , artificial intelligence , statistics , finance , quantum mechanics , economics
Purpose: To devise a position‐dependent point spread function (PSF) to account for differences in EPID response to X‐ray scattering, glare, and photon energy compared to a water slab modeled within a treatment planning system.Method: Since the EPID image corresponds to a discrete pixel grid, the method calculates a discrete, position‐dependent, PSF based only on measurements and treatment‐planning‐system (TPS) results, without resorting to separate Monte Carlo calculations. The PSF is sought in the form of a linear combination of azimuthally‐symmetric functions (depending only on the distance between the interaction and scoring point) with position‐dependent coefficients (to account for increased off‐axis response). The PSF is calculated for a suitable test‐pattern, by minimizing the difference, in a least‐squares sense, between the acquired EPID image and the image obtained from the superposition of the PSF on the TPS result. Results: The method was tested using numerically‐simulated TPS results and EPID measurements. To provide a numerically rigorous test for the method, a 20% increase in off‐axis EPID response due to beam softening (higher than the real value) was assumed. An 8 by 6 checkerboard field was used as the test pattern to calculate the PSF which was subsequently applied to a simulated IMRT field consisting of a 20 by 20 array of 5‐mm square beamlets with random fluence values. The calculated PSF was able to reproduce the EPID image for the test pattern to within 1% (compared to 15% for a position‐invariant PSF) and the EPID image for the IMRT field to within 0.5% (compared to 16% for a position‐invariant PSF). Conclusions: A method for calculating a discrete, position‐dependent EPID PSF was developed. Preliminary tests show the method to be successful in reproducing simulated X‐ray scattering, glare, and off‐axis response of the EPID to within 1 %, which makes it promising for IMRT QA.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom