z-logo
Premium
SU‐C‐110‐06: Lung Tumor Volume Change and Correlation to Initial Size and Motion
Author(s) -
Ewell L,
Hepler C,
Nguyen N,
Elguindi S
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3611490
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , radiation therapy , medicine , lung volumes , volume (thermodynamics) , breathing , lesion , lung , diaphragm (acoustics) , lung cancer , radiology , physics , anatomy , surgery , pathology , quantum mechanics , acoustics , loudspeaker
Purpose: To quantify the volume change of lung tumors during the course of therapeutic radiation as a function of initial volume and respiration induced motion. Methods: Nine lung cancer patients were scanned on a Philips Big Bore Brilliance© CT scanner. They were subsequently rescanned after 4,000cGy of therapeutic lung tumor irradiation. Time dependence of the CT scans was obtained via placement of a bellows around the abdomen. Lung tumor lesions were contoured on inspiration (0% breathing phase) and exhalation (50% breathing phase) by a board certified radiation oncologist. Lesion volume and centroids were determined automatically via treatment planning software (Pinnacle© 9.0, ADAC Philips). External markers (BBs) were placed laterally and anterior to the approximate lesion location and formed a reference position. Results: The reference position in general had less than one mm of motion. The average initial distance from lesion centroid to the diaphragm was 9.3 ± 5.3cm (SD, range 0.57–21.18cm). Upon rescan, the average distance was 9.1 ± 4.8cm. The average initial tumor centroid motion was 0.10 ± 0.08, 0.21 ± 0.17 and 0.70 ± 0.63cm forthe left‐right, anterior‐posterior and superior‐inferior directions respectively. Upon rescan, the same averages were 0.11 ± 0.08, 0.25 ±0.16 and 0.65 ± 0.57cm. The average initial tumor volume was 27.6 ± 37.7cc (range 3.3 – 122.8cc). Upon rescan the average volume was 21.3 ± 30.9cc (range 0.5 – 97.1cc). For tumors whose volume was reduced by 40% or more (4 of 9, 44%), the ratio of superior‐inferior motion after rescan to before showed less variation than for the lesions whose volume changed less: 1.07 ± 0.36 vs. 0.79 ± 0.76. Conclusions: A trend was observed that suggests after 4,000cGy of therapeutic radiation, tumors with less volume change have less predictable motion change, than for tumors that experience a larger volume change.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom