Premium
Phase‐contrast digital tomosynthesis
Author(s) -
Hammonds Jeffrey C.,
Price Ronald R.,
Donnelly Edwin F.,
Pickens David R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3574871
Subject(s) - tomosynthesis , optics , edge enhancement , materials science , detector , contrast to noise ratio , radiography , pixel , digital radiography , nuclear medicine , physics , image processing , computer science , image quality , medicine , computer vision , mammography , cancer , breast cancer , nuclear physics , image (mathematics)
Purpose: Phase‐contrast (PC) edge enhancement occurs at the boundary between different tissues and is an interference effect that results from the differential phase‐shifts that the x‐rays acquire while traversing the two tissues. While observable in planar phase‐contrast radiographs, the impact of digital tomosynthesis on this edge enhancement effect has not been previously reported. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate: (1) that phase‐contrast digital tomosynthesis (PC‐DTS) is possible with a conventional x‐ray source, (2) that the reconstructed tomosynthesis images demonstrate and retain edge enhancement as compared to planar phase‐contrast radiographs and (3) tomosynthesis improves object contrast by reducing the effects of superimposed structures.Methods: An unmodified, commercially available cabinet x‐ray system (Faxitron LX‐60) was used. The system contains a tungsten anode x‐ray tube that was operated at 24 kVp and 3 mAs for each PC radiographic image taken, with a nominal focal spot size of 0.010 mm. The digital detector uses CsI/CMOS with a pixel size of 0.054 mm × 0.054 mm. Objects to be imaged were attached to a computer‐controlled rotating motor and are rotated ± 25° about a central position in one degree increments. At each increment, three phase‐contrast radiographs are taken and then averaged to reduce the effect of noise. These planar images are then used to reconstruct a series of 56 longitudinal tomographic images with an image offset increment of about 0.7 mm.Results: Tomographic z‐plane resolution was measured to be approximately 4 mm. When compared to planar PC images, the tomosynthesis images were shown to retain the PC boundary edge enhancement in addition to an improvement in object contrast.Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that PC digital tomosynthesis retains the edge‐enhancement observed in planar PC radiograph and further improves soft‐tissue conspicuity by reducing the effects of superimposed tissue structure.