Premium
TH‐C‐203‐04: Implementation of a “Time Out” Procedure in Radiation Oncology: A Multi‐Institution Study over Nine Years Results in a Three‐Fold Reduction in Misadministrations
Author(s) -
Rasmussen B,
Chu K
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3469477
Subject(s) - radiation oncology , medicine , minor (academic) , medical physics , medical physicist , quality assurance , radiation therapy , nuclear medicine , surgery , political science , law , external quality assessment , pathology
Purpose: In recent years the medical industry as a whole has put an increased emphasis on “Time Out or TO” procedures as a way to improve the quality of care. For radiation oncology TO procedures are rarely used since the error (medical events misadministrations) rate is estimated to be <0.06% for reportable events. It is suggested that the error rates may be further reduced by implementing a TO for all radiation therapy procedures. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effectiveness of TO procedures in radiation therapy. Method and Materials: The misadministration records from five different cancer centers in New York and Michigan States were reviewed from 2000 to 2009. Within this time period a TO procedure was implemented at each cancer center. Error rates were tabulated for the years before and after the time out procedure was implemented. Errors were broken down into 2 categories: minor and major as defined by the following: a) Minor discrepancy (error<10% in total dose; issues resolved before major error occurred ) b) Major Errors of which there are two types : d) Reportable Misadministration (error ≥ 10% but < 20%) d) Reportable Misadministration (error ≥ 50% in 1 day; error ≥ 20% in total wrong site person or energy) Results: After the implementation of TO procedures a reduction in error rates by a factor of three was realized. For the clinics in this study the TO procedure was supported by administration as an extension of hospital policy for medical procedures. Conclusion: TO procedures were found to be effective in reducing the number of errors in radiation therapy. Based on these findings it is recommended that the TO be implemented in all radiation oncology centers: the improvements to patient safety easily justified the cost of an additional 15 seconds per field.