Premium
WE‐D‐204B‐05: Online Monitoring and Error Detection of Real‐Time Tumor Displacement Prediction Accuracy Using Statistical Process Control
Author(s) -
Malinowski KT,
Mc Avoy TJ,
George R,
Dieterich S,
D'Souza WD
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3469402
Subject(s) - percentile , statistics , mathematics , nuclear medicine , regression analysis , displacement (psychology) , linear regression , statistic , fraction (chemistry) , medicine , chemistry , psychology , psychotherapist , organic chemistry
Purpose : To investigate two statistical process control (SPC) metrics, the Hotelling (T 2 ) statistic and the input‐variable‐squared‐prediction‐error (Q (x) ), for predicting degradation in real‐time tumor displacement accuracy without explicit measurement of tumor displacement. Method and Materials : Independently but concurrently localized tumor and external surrogate positions from a database of Cyberknife Synchrony™ cases (130 treatment fractions from 63 lung tumors, 10 fractions from 5 liver tumors, and 48 fractions from 23 pancreas tumors) were analyzed. Each fraction consisted of 40–112 measurements obtained at an average rate of 0.018 Hz. The first 10 measured internal/external samples in each fraction were used to create fraction‐specific models of tumor displacement using external surrogates. The regression coefficients relating the 3D positions of the 3 skin markers to the 3D tumor positions were calculated using partial‐least‐squares (PLS) regression. The PLS model was applied to all subsequent localizations in the fraction. The T 2 ‐ and Q (x) ‐statistics in the training data were used to develop 90 th , 95 th and 99 th percentile ranges of expected T 2 and Q (x) values. The sensitivities and specificities of T 2 , Q (x) , T 2 ̆Q (x) , and T 2 ̑Q (x) for predicting real‐time tumor displacement errors greater than 3mm and 5mm were determined. Results : The T 2 , Q (x) , T 2 ̆Q (x) , and T 2 ̑Q (x) statistics' sensitivities and specificities varied with error threshold and acceptable percentile ranges of values. In general, the Q (x) statistic was associated with high sensitivity and low specificity, while the T 2 statistic was associated with moderate sensitivity and moderate specificity. For 90 th percentile T 2 , 99 th percentile Q (x) and 3 mm error, the sensitivities of T 2 , Q (x) , T 2 ̆Q (x) , and T 2 ̑Q (x) were 69%, 88%, 92%, and 64%, respectively, and the specificities were 62%, 37%, 28%, and 72%, respectively. Conclusion : This study illustrates the feasibility of SPC metrics for detecting breakdowns in tumor displacement prediction accuracy using external sensors. Conflict of Interest : Funded by NIH grant CA 124766
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom