z-logo
Premium
SU‐GG‐T‐325: The Effects of Neurosurgical Titanium Mesh on Radiation Dose in the Gamma Knife
Author(s) -
Chin K,
Rakowski J
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3468721
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , materials science , nuclear medicine , dosimetry , biomedical engineering , medicine
Purpose: To investigate the impact of titanium neurosurgical mesh and bone cement on Gamma Knife dose distributions. Methods and Materials: Radiation properties of several meshes and bone cement were evaluated using a Theratron Co‐60 teletherapy unit. The mesh that caused the largest perturbation of the beam was then studied in the Leksell Gamma Knife. A head phantom was constructed using a plaster skull and ballistics gel. A section of the skull was removed and replaced with mesh. Two plans were created in the Leksell GammaPlan treatment planning software, one comprising a single 18 mm diameter shot centered at 2 cm below the surface of the phantom, and one 5cm below the surface. The plans were delivered to the phantom with bone and with mesh for a total of four deliveries. Dose profiles were measured in the coronal plane along with surface dose using GafChromic film, analyzed using RIT and ImageJ. Results: For the shallow lesion at 2cm depth, the measured maximum dose with the mesh was 5% less than the measured dose with the intact skull. For the lesion at 5 cm depth, the measured maximum dose with the mesh was 2% less than the measured dose with bone. At the surface immediately above the mesh, there was a 70% increase in dose. Conclusion: This work is significant in evaluating the need to modify a Gamma Knife SRS treatment plan when titanium mesh is present. For shallow lesions near the mesh, there is an associated a 5% reduction in maximum dose, and a 1 mm reduction in the 50% isodose diameter. These values decreased to 2% and 0 mm at 5 cm depth. However, for either depth, the dose at the mesh surface was increased by 68%, due to backscatter from the mesh.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom