z-logo
Premium
SU‐EE‐A2‐05: Central Electrode Correction Factor, Pcel, for Steel and Wire Electrodes
Author(s) -
Muir B,
Rogers D
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3468016
Subject(s) - ionization chamber , electrode , dosimetry , materials science , collimated light , beam (structure) , absorbed dose , linear particle accelerator , ion , monte carlo method , optics , analytical chemistry (journal) , physics , nuclear medicine , ionization , chemistry , medicine , laser , quantum mechanics , statistics , mathematics , chromatography
Purpose: Beam quality conversion factors, k Q , are required for use with the TG‐51 clinical dosimetry protocol. TG‐51 values of k Q are calculated using the ratio of several correction factors including the central electrode correction factor, P cel , which is known for ion chambers with aluminum or graphite electrodes. This study calculates P cel values in photon beams for more recent chambers that use electrodes composed of high‐Z materials. Method and Materials: Monte Carlo simulations using the EGSnrc user‐code egs_chamber are used to calculate the absorbed dose to the gas in an ion chamber with and without the central electrode. The ratio of the two doses gives P cel . Manufacturers' blueprints and user's manuals are used to model the ion chambers. The source is modeled as a collimated point source from tabulated spectra for Cobalt‐60 and linear accelerator photon beams. Spectra used include some linear accelerators without flattening filters to investigate the value of P cel in ‘soft’ beams. Results: For small volume ion chambers with electrodes composed of high‐Z materials the central electrode effect is unlike that of aluminum electrodes in standard Farmer‐like chambers. This results in k Q factors which are up to 1.5% larger for clinical beams than those used in current dosimetry protocols. For standard Farmer‐like chambers, P cel does not depend on the degree of filtration in the beam but for chambers with high‐Z electrodes P cel is different by up to 1.5% in lightly‐filtered beams compared to values in typical clinical beams. Conclusion: Calculations of the central electrode correction factor in photon beams have shown that ion chambers with electrodes made of high‐Z materials have significantly larger electrode effects (1 to 2.5%) than those with aluminum electrodes (<0.8%). It would be best to avoid such high‐Z electrode materials.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom