z-logo
Premium
Megavoltage planar and cone‐beam imaging with low‐ Z targets: Dependence of image quality improvement on beam energy and patient separation
Author(s) -
Robar James L.,
Connell Tanner,
Huang Weihong,
Kelly Robin G.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3183499
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , image quality , materials science , contrast to noise ratio , optics , linear particle accelerator , beam (structure) , medical imaging , image resolution , nuclear medicine , planar , detector , cone beam computed tomography , flat panel detector , physics , medicine , radiology , computer science , computed tomography , image (mathematics) , computer graphics (images) , artificial intelligence
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the improvement of megavoltage planar and cone‐beam CT (CBCT) image quality with the use of low atomic number ( Z ) external targets in the linear accelerator. Methods: In this investigation, two experimental megavoltage imaging beams were generated by using either 3.5 or 7.0 MeV electrons incident on aluminum targets installed above the level of the carousel in a linear accelerator (2100EX, Varian Medical, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Images were acquired using an amorphous silicon detector panel. Contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) in planar and CBCT images was measured as a function of dose and a comparison was made between the imaging beams and the standard 6 MV therapy beam. Phantoms of variable diameter were used to examine the loss of contrast due to beam hardening. Porcine imaging was conducted to examine qualitatively the advantages of the low‐ Z target approach in CBCT. Results: In CBCT imaging CNR increases by factors as high as 2.4 and 4.3 for the 7.0 and 3.5 MeV ∕ Al beams, respectively, compared to images acquired with 6 MV . Similar factors of improvement are observed in planar imaging. For the imaging beams, beam hardening causes a significant loss of the contrast advantage with increasing phantom diameter; however, for the 3.5 MeV ∕ Al beam and a phantom diameter of 25 cm , a contrast advantage remains, with increases of contrast by factors of 1.5 and 3.4 over 6 MV for bone and lung inhale regions, respectively. The spatial resolution is improved slightly in CBCT images for the imaging beams. CBCT images of a porcine cranium demonstrate qualitatively the advantages of the low‐ Z target approach, showing greater contrast between tissues and improved visibility of fine detail. Conclusions: The use of low‐ Z external targets in the linear accelerator improves megavoltage planar and CBCT image quality significantly. CNR may be increased by a factor of 4 or greater. Improvement of the spatial resolution is also apparent.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here