Premium
TH‐D‐BRB‐02: Dose Comparison Study of a 2D Scintillating Fiber Dosimeter Array Prototype with Ionization Chamber and Film Measurements
Author(s) -
Guillot M,
Gingras L,
Beaulieu L
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3182665
Subject(s) - ionization chamber , dosimeter , optics , detector , scintillation , dosimetry , materials science , scintillation counter , optical fiber , calibration , ionization , physics , nuclear medicine , radiation , medicine , ion , quantum mechanics
Purpose: To present results from a dose comparison study of a 2D scintillation fiber dosimeter array (SFDA) prototype with ionization chamber and film measurements. Method and Materials: The SFDA prototype consist in 729 scintillation fiber dosimeters insert up in a solid water slab (Plastic Water DT, Radiation Products Design Inc.) with a uniform spacing of 1 cm, covering a 26 cm by 26 cm region. Each detector consist in a 1 mm diameter and 2.5 mm long polystyrene plastic scintillating fiber (BFC‐12, Saint‐Gobain, Inc.) coupled to a 2.5 m long acrylic plastic optical fiber (Eska, Mitsubishi). Subtractions of the parasite Cerenkov signal produce in the optical fibers has been done using a spectral discrimination technique. The calibration of the 729 detectors was performed using dose profiles of a 30×30 cm 2 6MV photon field measured with an IC‐10 ionization chamber. The comparison of the SFDA response with ionization chamber measurements has been done with a dose profile produced by a simple 10×10 cm 2 6MV photon beam. The comparison of the SFDA and film measurements has been done with a strong gradient dose distribution produced by a combination of three 6MV photon fields. Results: Results from the comparison of the SFDA and ionization chamber measurements using a 10×10 cm 2 field show that most detectors of the array are in agreement with the IC‐10 measurements within 1% of the maximum dose for both in‐field and out‐of‐field regions. The comparison of the SFDA and film measurements using a complex dose distribution show that these two detectors are in agreement within less than 2% of the maximum dose. Conclusion: The SFDA measurements show good agreement with conventional detectors. This dosimeter array could potentially be use as a quality assurance tool for IMRT and arc therapy patient plan verification.