Premium
WE‐C‐304A‐08: The Instrumentation Noise Equivalent Exposure (INEE): Including Conversion, Secondary Quantum, Structure and Electronic Noise
Author(s) -
KuhlsGilcrist A,
Bednarek D,
Rudin S
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3182495
Subject(s) - detective quantum efficiency , noise (video) , quantum noise , instrumentation (computer programming) , image noise , flicker noise , optics , noise spectral density , shot noise , physics , noise floor , noise measurement , detector , noise figure , noise reduction , acoustics , optoelectronics , image quality , quantum , computer science , amplifier , cmos , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , operating system
Purpose: To provide a quantitative and clinically relevant measure of the instrumentation noise of digital x‐ray imagers, using the Instrumentation Noise Equivalent Exposure (INEE). Method and Materials: The NPS was “decomposed” into constituent elements of primary quantum noise, Poisson excess noise (Swank noise), secondary quantum noise, structure noise and additive electronic noise using a plot of the total measured NPS versus exposure and using known relationships based on a generalized parallel cascade model analysis. The INEE was determined by measuring the exposure at which the total instrumentation noise and primary quantum noise were equivalent. Exposures at the INEE correspond to a drop in DQE of one‐half. To demonstrate the usefulness of this new metric, the spatial‐frequency‐dependent INEE was measured on a clinical (indirect) dynamic flat panel detector (FPD) with a pixel pitch of 194 μm and a 600 μm thick CsI:Tl phosphor. Results: The INEE was measured to be 2.0, 7.1 and 75 μR at 0, 1 and 1.2 cycles/mm, respectively. Above 1.2 cycles/mm the detector was instrumentation‐noise‐limited at all exposures, resulting in a degradation in image quality beyond that dictated by the noise in the incident x‐ray quanta alone. Hence, above 1.2 cycles/mm the DQE was always less than half the maximum value. Conclusions: In this work, all sources of instrumentation noise were incorporated into the INEE formalism, consisting not only of the additive electronic noise, but also including the Poisson excess noise (i.e. noise resulting from the phosphor), secondary quantum noise (i.e. noise resulting from the conversion and transmission of quanta) and structure noise (i.e. noise resulting from variations in the detector sensitivity). The INEE can be used to assess quantum‐noise‐limited operation at all spatial frequencies of interest by characterizing the total instrumentation noise in terms of equivalent detector entrance exposure. (Partial support: NIH grants R01EB008425, R01EB002873, R01NS43924)