Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐639: IVDT Variations and Their Impact On Dose Calculations
Author(s) -
Chao E,
Ruchala K,
Olivera G
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3182137
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , hounsfield scale , attenuation , nuclear medicine , tomotherapy , materials science , density of air , range (aeronautics) , cylinder , dosimetry , bone density , water equivalent , biomedical engineering , computed tomography , mathematics , physics , optics , geometry , medicine , radiation therapy , radiology , osteoporosis , meteorology , composite material , endocrinology , snow
Purpose: To investigate the impact of variations in the image value to density table on TomoTherapy® dose calculations. Method and Materials: An image value to density table (IVDT) was generated using the CT images of a solid water phantom with various tissue equivalent inserts. Additional density points were obtained by imaging a cylinder containing water, as well as the surrounding air. One IVDT was generated which included mappings for air and water, but only included tissue‐inserts with HU values outside of the −100 to +100HU range, to avoid undue influence from the tissue‐inserts in the critical density around water. For comparison, two other IVDT's were generated that a) did not include a mapping for air, or b) included the tissue‐inserts in the −100 to +100HU range. All image values were mapped to the physical density of each material. An IMRT plan was generated with a cylindrical target volume near the center of the solid water phantom, and DQA doses were calculated using each of the IVDT's. Results: Without including an explicit mapping for air, the default IVDT only included a point mapping −1024HU to 0 g/cc density. Since the mean air CT value was near −1000HU, the IVDT without an air mapping resulted in air being mapped to a density of approximately 0.024 g/cm 3 , versus a correct value of 0.001 g/cm 3 . The artificially high density and corresponding increased attenuation resulted in a reduced dose to the target volume of only 0.7%. However, the increased scatter through air elevated the surface dose by 3 – 4%. Including all tissue‐inserts in the IVDT increased the resulting mapped density of the solid‐water phantom by 4%, and reduced the calculated dose delivered to the target by 2.2%. Conclusion: Small variations to the IVDT generation process can have a measurable impact on the resulting calculated dose.