z-logo
Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐639: IVDT Variations and Their Impact On Dose Calculations
Author(s) -
Chao E,
Ruchala K,
Olivera G
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3182137
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , hounsfield scale , attenuation , nuclear medicine , tomotherapy , materials science , density of air , range (aeronautics) , cylinder , dosimetry , bone density , water equivalent , biomedical engineering , computed tomography , mathematics , physics , optics , geometry , medicine , radiation therapy , radiology , osteoporosis , meteorology , composite material , endocrinology , snow
Purpose: To investigate the impact of variations in the image value to density table on TomoTherapy® dose calculations. Method and Materials: An image value to density table (IVDT) was generated using the CT images of a solid water phantom with various tissue equivalent inserts. Additional density points were obtained by imaging a cylinder containing water, as well as the surrounding air. One IVDT was generated which included mappings for air and water, but only included tissue‐inserts with HU values outside of the −100 to +100HU range, to avoid undue influence from the tissue‐inserts in the critical density around water. For comparison, two other IVDT's were generated that a) did not include a mapping for air, or b) included the tissue‐inserts in the −100 to +100HU range. All image values were mapped to the physical density of each material. An IMRT plan was generated with a cylindrical target volume near the center of the solid water phantom, and DQA doses were calculated using each of the IVDT's. Results: Without including an explicit mapping for air, the default IVDT only included a point mapping −1024HU to 0 g/cc density. Since the mean air CT value was near −1000HU, the IVDT without an air mapping resulted in air being mapped to a density of approximately 0.024 g/cm 3 , versus a correct value of 0.001 g/cm 3 . The artificially high density and corresponding increased attenuation resulted in a reduced dose to the target volume of only 0.7%. However, the increased scatter through air elevated the surface dose by 3 – 4%. Including all tissue‐inserts in the IVDT increased the resulting mapped density of the solid‐water phantom by 4%, and reduced the calculated dose delivered to the target by 2.2%. Conclusion: Small variations to the IVDT generation process can have a measurable impact on the resulting calculated dose.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom