Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐604: Evaluation of IMRT Plans From Four Treatment Planning Systems Based On Independent Monte Carlo Dose Calculation
Author(s) -
Chi Z,
Cao Y,
Zhang Y,
Liu D,
Li R,
Qiu R,
Han C
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3182102
Subject(s) - pinnacle , monte carlo method , nuclear medicine , radiation treatment planning , medicine , medical physics , computer science , mathematics , radiation therapy , statistics , radiology
Purpose: This work employs the Monte Carlo method to recompute the IMRT dose distributions from four TPS to provide a platform for independent comparison and evaluation of the plan quality in terms of target conformity. Method and Materials: Eleven prostate cases were planned with the Corvus, Xio, Pinnacle and Eclipse TPS using appropriate optimization parameters and dose constraints. The plans were recalculated by Monte Carlo using leaf sequences and MUs for individual plans. Dose‐volume‐histograms and isodose distributions were compared. Other quantities such as D min (the minimum dose received by 99% of CTV/PTV), D max (the maximum dose received by 1% of CTV/PTV), the volume of rectum and bladder receiving 65 and 40Gy, and the volume of femur receiving 50Gy were evaluated. Total segments and Mus were also compared. Results: Special care must be taken to reproduce the dose distributions from different TPS due to their implementation of effective leaf locations. This may introduce up to a few percent differences in the absolute dose between treatment plans. The Monte Carlo results agreed with the dose distributions from the TPS to within 3%/3mm. The Xio, Pinnacle and Eclipse plans show less target dose heterogeneity (smaller D max ) and lower V 65 and V 40 for the rectum and bladder compared to the Corvus plans. The PTV D min is about 2Gy lower for Xio plans than others and the Corvus plans have slightly lower V 50 than others. The Corvus plans require significantly most segments and Mus to deliver and the Pinnacle plans require fewest segments and Mus. Conclusions: We have tested an independent Monte Carlo dose calculation system for dose reconstruction and plan evaluation. This system provides a platform for the fair comparison and evaluation of treatment plans to facilitate clinical decision making in selecting a TPS and beam delivery system for particular treatment sites.