Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐339: Small Field Electron Beam Dosimetry Using MOSFET Detector
Author(s) -
Amin M,
Heaton R,
Norrlinger B,
Islam M
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3181820
Subject(s) - dosimetry , dosimeter , ionization chamber , mosfet , materials science , imaging phantom , dose profile , linear particle accelerator , beam (structure) , absorbed dose , optics , cathode ray , electron , sensitivity (control systems) , linearity , optoelectronics , nuclear medicine , physics , ion , nuclear physics , transistor , electronic engineering , medicine , engineering , quantum mechanics , voltage , ionization
Purpose: The dosimetry of very small electron fields can be challenging due to relative shifts in percent depth‐dose curves, including the location of d max , and lack of lateral electronic equilibrium in an ion chamber when placed in the beam. Conventionally, a small parallel plate chamber or film is utilized to perform small field electron beam dosimetry. With the advent of electronic imaging, modern radiotherapy departments are moving to a filmless environment and an alternate clinical dosimeter is required for routine clinical dosimetry. In this work, we have studied the performance of MOSFET as a relative dosimeter for small field electron beams. Methods and materials: The reproducibility, linearity and sensitivity of a high sensitivity micro MOSFET were investigated for clinical electron beams. In addition, the percent depth doses, output factors and profiles have been measured in a water tank with MOSFET and compared with those measured by an ion chamber and film for a range of field sizes from 1 cm diameter to 10×10 cm 2 for 6, 12, 16 and 20 MeV beams. Similar comparative measurements were also performed with MOSFET as well as with films in solid water phantom. Results: The MOSFET sensitivity was found to be stable over the range of field sizes investigated. The dose response was found to be linear and reproducible (within ±1% for 100 cGy). For 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 cm circular and 10 cm square field, excellent agreement (within ±2% and ±2mm) was observed among the central axis depth dose curves measured using MOSFET, film and ion chamber. The output factors measured with MOSFET for small fields agreed to within 2% with those measured by film dosimetry. Conclusion: Overall results indicate that MOSFET can be utilized to perform dosimetry of small electron fields for routine clinical use.