z-logo
Premium
SU‐DD‐A4‐05: Effects of Pixel Size and OSEM Iteration Parameters On Tc‐99m SPECT Resolution
Author(s) -
Kappadath S,
Erwin W
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3181091
Subject(s) - isocenter , physics , iterative reconstruction , pixel , nuclear medicine , imaging phantom , image resolution , collimated light , spect imaging , optics , medicine , radiology , laser
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of pixel size and OSEM iterative reconstruction parameters on radial (RR) and tangential (TR) Tc‐99m SPECT resolution versus distance from isocenter. Method and Materials: Ten high‐concentration Tc‐99m point sources of size <2mm 3 were positioned coplanar 0–9 cm from isocenter in a cylindrical phantom with low‐concentration background. Emission scans were acquired on a SPECT/CT system (Symbia T6, Siemens Medical Solutions) with LEHR collimation in continuous (C) and step‐and‐shoot (SS) modes for 360 views over 360° at 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 mm/pixel. Data were iteratively reconstructed with 3D‐OSEM incorporating resolution, CT‐based attenuation, and scatter modeling, for different combinations of iterations and subsets (IT_SUB): 1_18, 10_18, 20_18, 30_18, 30_36, 30_60, 30_90. SPECT resolution was estimated using a Gaussian fit of the radial and tangential profiles through each point source. Results: TR was consistently better than RR. Anisotropy was independent of pixel size and scan mode but decreased with IT times SUB (e.g., TR/RR=0.78 and 0.62 for 1_18 and 30_90 with 0.9 mm/pixel in SS). Both TR and RR improved linearly with distance away from isocenter. The center‐to‐periphery resolution differences decreased with IT times SUB (e.g., slopes of resolution versus radius were −0.74 and −0.45 for 20_18 and 30_36 with 0.9 mm/pixel in SS) and with smaller pixel sizes (e.g., slopes of resolution versus radius were −0.89, −0.82 and −0.74 for 3.6, 1.8 and 0.9 mm/pixel for 20_18 in SS). TR and RR improved as a power‐law with IT times SUB. The rate of improvement showed no obvious dependence on pixel size. TR and RR were similar between SS and C. Conclusion: Spatial resolution of SPECT images reconstructed iteratively exhibited power‐law dependence on IT times SUB, linear dependence on radial position, and exhibited TR/RR anisotropy — modeling of which are important for accurate SPECT quantification.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom