Premium
Sci‐Fri AM: YIS‐07: A new paradigm for improving IMRT: Selection of beam orientations by optimizing beam intersection volume
Author(s) -
Potrebko P,
McCurdy B
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2965969
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , radiation therapy , medicine , radiology
A beam orientation optimization (BOO) algorithm based on optimizing beam intersection volume (BIV) components within an Organ‐at‐Risk (OAR) is proposed to improve conventional intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A simulated annealing algorithm was employed to search for the optimal set of five beam orientations (5‐opt) which simultaneously minimize the BIV components within an OAR. The 5‐opt plans were compared to standard 5, 7, and 9 equiangular‐spaced beam plans (5‐equi, 7‐equi, 9‐equi) for: (1) gastric (2) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P‐0126 prostate and (3) RTOG H‐0022 oropharyngeal (Stage‐III, IV) cancer patients. In the gastric case, the coplanar 5‐opt plan reduced the right kidney V 20 Gy by 41.1%, 32.1%, and 29.5% compared to the 5‐equi, 7‐equi, and 9‐equi plans. In the prostate case, the coplanar 5‐opt plan improved rectal sparing over all standard plans with a reduction of the V 75 Gy, V 70 Gy, V 65 Gy, and V 60 Gy of 3.9%, 6.2%, 8.1%, and 10.6% compared to the 5‐equi plan. In both oropharyngeal cases, the non‐coplanar 5‐opt plan substantially reduced the V 30 Gy and mean dose to the contralateral parotid compared to the 5‐equi, 7‐equi, and 9‐equi plans: (Stage‐III) 8.9%, 7.0%, 8.6% and 4.1 Gy, 2.5 Gy, 2.7 Gy (Stage‐IV) 11.2%, 11.2%, 10.8% and 7.8 Gy, 7.9 Gy, 8.0 Gy. In conclusion, the method of optimizing BIV to produce substantial improvements in OAR sparing over conventional IMRT has been demonstrated to be robust for application to a variety of IMRT treatment sites.