Premium
Poster — Thurs Eve‐09: Evaluation of a commercial 2D ion‐chamber array for intensity modulated radiation therapy dose measurements
Author(s) -
Mei X,
Bracken G,
Kerr A
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2965928
Subject(s) - ionization chamber , dosimeter , dosimetry , reproducibility , dose profile , quality assurance , materials science , radiation treatment planning , nuclear medicine , detector , calibration , linearity , medical physics , optics , radiation therapy , ion , physics , medicine , mathematics , radiology , statistics , external quality assessment , pathology , quantum mechanics , ionization
Experimental verification of calculated dose from a treatment planning system is often essential for quality assurance (QA) of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Film dosimetry and single ion chamber measurements are commonly used for IMRT QA. Film dosimetry has very good spatial resolution, but is labor intensive and absolute dose is not reliable. Ion chamber measurements are still required for absolute dose after measurements using films. Dosimeters based on 2D detector arrays that can measure 2D dose in real‐time are gaining wider use. These devices provide a much easier and reliable tool for IMRT QA. We report the evaluation of a commercial 2D ion chamber array, including its basic performance characteristics, such as linearity, reproducibility and uniformity of relative ion chamber sensitivities, and comparisons between measured 2D dose and calculated dose with a commercial treatment planning system. Our analysis shows this matrix has excellent linearity and reproducibility, but relative sensitivities are tilted such that the +Y region is over sensitive, while the −Y region is under sensitive. Despite this behavior, our results show good agreement between measured 2D dose profiles and Eclipse planned data for IMRT test plans and a few verification plans for clinical breast field‐in‐field plans. The gamma values (3% or 3 mm distance‐to‐agreement) are all less than 1 except for one or two pixels at the field edge This device provides a fast and reliable stand‐alone dosimeter for IMRT QA.