Premium
TH‐C‐AUD A‐08: Evaluation of Electronic Equilibrium Conditions Near Brachytherapy Sources
Author(s) -
PerezCalatayud J,
Granero D,
Rivard M,
Melhus C,
Pujades M,
Ballester F
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2962843
Subject(s) - kerma , monte carlo method , brachytherapy , disequilibrium , photon , dosimetry , physics , computational physics , radiation , radioactive source , radioactive decay , nuclear medicine , nuclear physics , detector , optics , radiation therapy , mathematics , statistics , medicine , radiology , ophthalmology
Purpose: For high‐energy photon‐emitting brachytherapy sources such as60 Co ,137 Cs ,192 Ir , and169 Yb , the main contribution of the systematic uncertainty in the dose distributions near the sources is understanding of electronic equilibrium and the contribution of β‐rays due to radioactive disintegration. Thus, it is important to study these effects in detail to accurately depict dose distributions near these brachytherapy sources. This work studies the relative importance of β‐ray contributions to total dose (β + γ + x‐ray), and feasibility of using the approximation “collision kerma equals dose in electronic equilibrium conditions.” Method and Materials: Characteristics of kerma and dose distributions were studied for spherical60 Co ,137 Cs , and192 Ir sources with composition, encapsulation, and dimensions similar to those existing in the literature. Dose contribution of β‐rays and γ+x‐rays were individually examined using the GEANT4 Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Results: The comparison of kerma and dose rate distributions indicate ∼ 20% electronic disequilibrium within 1 mm of sources, with60 Co have the most pronounced effect. When examining the dose contribution of β‐rays,60 Co again had the most pronounced effect out to 5 mm beyond the capsule, with β‐rays contributions for192 Ir and137 Cs 1.5 and 0.5 mm beyond the capsule, respectively. Conclusion: The dosimetric effect of β‐rays for high‐energy photon‐emitting radionuclides and the influence of the electronic disequilibrium near of the sources were studied using Monte Carlo methods. For60 Co and137 Cs brachytherapy sources, electronic disequilibrium has an important role near the source. For192 Ir the main perturbing dosimetric effect near the source is from β‐ray contributions and not electronic disequilibrium.