Premium
TU‐D‐AUD C‐04: Response of An Implantable MOSFET Dosimeter to 192Ir HDR Radiation
Author(s) -
Fagerstrom J,
Micka J,
DeWerd L
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2962585
Subject(s) - detector , dosimeter , dosimetry , mosfet , optics , irradiation , radiation , materials science , calibration , optoelectronics , nuclear medicine , physics , nuclear physics , medicine , transistor , voltage , quantum mechanics
Purpose: To characterize the response of implantable MOSFET dosimeters to192 Ir HDR radiation. Method and Materials: Sicel Technologies, Inc. has developed an implantable MOSFET detector that is read telemetrically by an inductively coupled antenna. All tests were performed in Virtual Water™ phantoms. To test detector response to dose rates near those delivered by192 Ir HDR sources, detectors were irradiated at four SADs by a60 Co source. Detector response to60 Co relative to192 Ir energies was tested by alternating fractions between60 Co and192 Ir . The effect of accumulated dose was tested with detectors at 3, 4, and 5 cm from an192 Ir source. The rotational and longitudinal angular responses were tested by irradiating the dosimeters at varying orientations around the source. Results: Differences in detector response due to varying60 Co dose rates were not statistically measurable. The detectors were more sensitive to192 Ir than60 Co energies, and demonstrated a nonlinear accumulated dose effect. This effect was characterized by three third‐order polynomials fit to data from detectors placed at three different distances from the source. The detectors have little angular dependence except when the detector is irradiated with the coil and electronics assembly aligned between the MOSFETs and incident radiation. This orientation causes a −15.3% difference in response. Conclusion: Dose rates between 22 and 84 cGy/min do not measurably affect detector response. The energy response and accumulated dose effect have been characterized. The angular response of the detectors is minimal except when the MOSFETs are irradiated through the coil and electronics assembly. This effect may be minimized by establishing proper orientation in implantation protocols. A calibration curve obtained with192 Ir would allow the dosimeter to be used for absolute dose measurements with192 Ir HDR radiation. Conflict of Interest: Funding for this research was provided in part by Sicel Technologies, Inc.