Premium
SU‐GG‐T‐504: Verification of Accuracy of the Monte Carlo Based Electron Treatment Planning System
Author(s) -
Lee J,
Chan R
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2962253
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , electron , physics , computational physics , radiation treatment planning , ionization chamber , field (mathematics) , atomic physics , nuclear medicine , nuclear physics , ion , mathematics , statistics , ionization , medicine , quantum mechanics , radiation therapy , pure mathematics
Purpose: To verify accuracy of the Monte Carlo based electron treatment planning system (Varian Eclipse, eMC 8.1) in modeling blocked electron fields. Method and Materials: Dose distributions, for open field with cones sizes 10×10cm 2 and 15×15cm 2 at standard source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) and extended SSD (113cm); plus blocked fields of 3×3cm 2 , 4×4cm 2 , 5‐cm diameter circle, and an irregular field at 100SSD, using various electron energies, measured using MapCheck device, are compared to those generated by eMC algorithm. γ index (3%/3mm) is used for analysis. Inhomogeneous (air and 3mm Al) and angular effects are also evaluated. Output measurements are confirmed with ion chamber. Results: There is a good agreement between measured and planned dose distributions for 10×10cm 2 and 15×15cm 2 cones at 100SSD and 113SSD at the depth of 2.5cm for 9 MeV and 3cm for 12–22 MeV, except eMC algorithm overestimates low dose regions in all energies. For 12 MeV, the algorithm overestimates dose less than 20cGy by 40%. The eMC algorithm can predict dose distributions well when different cutouts are inserted. However, 34% of measured points had γ >1 (TH= 10%) for irregular field with 18 MeV. Obliquity effect has test for 9 and 15 MeV. γ values for 9 and 15 MeV, measured at 105SSD with 10×10 cm 2 cone, are 97.7% and 89.2% for gantry angle of 10° and 94.7% and 91.5% for 20°. The algorithm also shows a good agreement when inhomogenity present. But it underestimates dose under an air cavity for 9 MeV by 13.7%. Dose measured when computed MU delivered is within tolerance. Conclusion: Study shows that eMC can model dose distributions for blocked fields and different setup geometries with more than 90% of accuracy. This provides better dose estimation for treatment over critical organs. Further study is need for air cavity interface.