z-logo
Premium
SU‐GG‐T‐324: Characteristics and Dosimetric Parameters of Small Radiosurgery Photon Beams
Author(s) -
Ding G,
Coffey C
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2962076
Subject(s) - stopping power , imaging phantom , monte carlo method , dosimetry , linear particle accelerator , photon , beam (structure) , range (aeronautics) , optics , flattening , radiosurgery , materials science , fluence , attenuation coefficient , physics , nuclear medicine , detector , mathematics , statistics , radiation therapy , medicine , laser , composite material
Purpose: The accuracy of dosimetric parameters, such as water‐to‐air stopping power ratios, directly affects the accuracy of a beam calibration. This study investigates the variation of dosimetric parameters, such as energy spectrum, water‐to‐air stopping power ratios, energy absorption coefficient, etc., as a function of field size and depth in water for small radiosurgery photon beams. Method and Materials: The Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used in this study. The accelerator head geometries of a Varian Trilogy were simulated in detail including two designs of flattening filters: one for a conventional dose rate (100–600 MU/min) and the other for a high‐dose rate (1000 MU/min) 6 MV beam. The design of the flattening filter to produce a high‐dose rate beam limits its maximum field size to 10×10 cm 2 . The investigated field sizes range from 0.5 cm in diameter to 10×10 cm 2 and depths range from 0–50 cm in water. Results: Although there are noticeable differences in the spectrum distributions for beams with different flattening filters, the variations in calculated water‐to‐air stopping power ratios (SPR) are within 0.2%. The values of calculated water‐to‐air SPR as a function of field size and depth in a water phantom show a maximum variation of 0.4% and 1% respectively. The mean energy of photons increases as depth increases at a rate of 22 keV/cm for small fields. Conclusion: There is an insignificant variation (<0.4%) in water‐to‐air stopping power ratios between a small narrow field and a reference 10×10 cm 2 field. There is negligible difference (0.2%) in water‐to‐air SPR between beams with two very different beam flattening filters. Variations of water‐to‐air SPR are not significant between small and large field. Hence correction of water‐to‐air SPR between a reference field and a small field is negligible in the dose measurement for the small field.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom