Premium
Improving intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm
Author(s) -
Potrebko Peter S.,
McCurdy Boyd M. C.,
Butler James B.,
ElGubtan Adel S.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2905026
Subject(s) - equiangular polygon , nuclear medicine , radiation therapy , dosimetry , radiation treatment planning , orientation (vector space) , medicine , mathematics , radiology , geometry , monotone polygon
A novel, anatomic beam orientation optimization (A‐BOO) algorithm is proposed to significantly improve conventional intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The A‐BOO algorithm vectorially analyses polygonal surface mesh data of contoured patient anatomy. Five optimal (5‐opt) deliverable beam orientations are selected based on (1) tangential orientation bisecting the target and adjacent organ's‐at‐risk (OARs) to produce precipitous dose gradients between them and (2) parallel incidence with polygon features of the target volume to facilitate conformal coverage. The 5‐opt plans were compared to standard five, seven, and nine equiangular‐spaced beam plans (5‐equi, 7‐equi, 9‐equi) for: (1) gastric, (2) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P‐0126 prostate, and (3) RTOG H‐0022 oropharyngeal (stage‐III, IV) cancer patients. In the gastric case, the noncoplanar 5‐opt plan reduced the right kidney V 20 Gy by 32.2%, 23.2%, and 20.6% compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular‐spaced beams. In the prostate case, the coplanar 5‐opt plan produced similar rectal sparing as the 7‐equi and 9‐equi plans with a reduction of the V 75, V 70, V 65, and V 60 Gy of 2.4%, 5.3%, 7.0%, and 9.5% compared to the 5‐equi plan. In the stage‐III and IV oropharyngeal cases, the noncoplanar 5‐opt plan substantially reduced the V 30 Gy and mean dose to the contralateral parotid compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular‐spaced beams: (stage‐III) 7.1%, 5.2%, 6.8%, and 5.1, 3.5, 3.7 Gy and (stage‐IV) 10.2%, 10.2%, 9.8% and 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 Gy . The geometry‐based A‐BOO algorithm has been demonstrated to be robust for application to a variety of IMRT treatment sites. Beam orientations producing significant improvements in OAR sparing over conventional IMRT can be automatically produced in minutes compared to hours with existing dose‐based beam orientation optimization methods.