Premium
Maximum dose angle for oblique incidence on primary beam protective barriers in the design of medical radiation therapy facilities
Author(s) -
Fondevila Damián,
Arbiser Silvio,
Sansogne Rosana,
Brunetto Mónica,
Dosoretz Bernardo
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2898135
Subject(s) - incidence (geometry) , medicine , dosimetry , medical imaging , medical physicist , radiation therapy , beam (structure) , medical physics , nuclear medicine , optics , radiology , physics
Primary barrier determinations for the shielding of medical radiation therapy facilities are generally made assuming normal beam incidence on the barrier, since this is geometrically the most unfavorable condition for that shielding barrier whenever the occupation line is allowed to run along the barrier. However, when the occupation line (for example, the wall of an adjacent building) runs perpendicular to the barrier (especially roof barrier), then two opposing factors come in to play: increasing obliquity angle with respect to the barrier increases the attenuation, while the distance to the calculation point decreases, hence, increasing the dose. As a result, there exists an angle( α max)for which the equivalent dose results in a maximum, constituting the most unfavorable geometric condition for that shielding barrier. Based on the usual NCRP Report No. 151 model, this article presents a simple formula for obtainingα max, which is a function of the thickness of the barrier( t E )and the equilibrium tenth‐value layer(TVL e )of the shielding material for the nominal energy of the beam. It can be seen thatα maxincreases for increasingTVL e(hence, beam energy) and decreases for increasingt E , with a range of variation that goes from 13 to 40 deg for concrete barriers thicknesses in the range of 50–300 cm and most commercially available teletherapy machines. This parameter has not been calculated in the existing literature for radiotherapy facilities design and has practical applications, as in calculating the required unoccupied roof shielding for the protection of a nearby building located in the plane of the primary beam rotation.