z-logo
Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐161: Do Obliquity Factors Apply to 30° Scattered Radiation From Megavoltage Photon Beams?
Author(s) -
Biggs P,
Styczynski J
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2760820
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , physics , bremsstrahlung , photon , radiation , beam (structure) , fluence , photon energy , dosimetry , optics , computational physics , nuclear medicine , nuclear physics , irradiation , mathematics , statistics , medicine
Purpose: To determine the obliquity factor for megavoltage x‐rays for 30° scattered radiation in various materials by Monte Carlo. Methods and Materials: NCRP report ♯151 discusses the concept of the obliquity factor for primary barriers. Briefly stated, if the primary beam is incident at an angle θ to a barrier of thickness t, then the effective barrier thickness, t s is given by t/cos(θ). For secondary radiation, there are no explicit recommendations. However, in section 7 of that report, the following statement appears (p.115): “It would not be appropriate in this case [secondary radiation] to apply the obliquity factor of cos(30°), ….” The MCNP Monte Carlo code, v4.2C, has been used to generate scattered radiation at 30° to a secondary barrier for 4, 6, 10, 15 and 18 MV bremsstrahlung x‐ray beams for concrete, lead and steel. The barrier thickness was increased from zero to a thickness sufficient to reduce the fluence (f4 tally) to <10 −2 . A transmission curve was created for each energy‐barrier material combination by normalizing to zero thickness. The data was then compared to the values in NCRP ♯151 for concrete and lead. Results: The results for the first TVL show an average obliquity factor of 25.7° ± 3.3°, except for 10 MV in concrete where the value was 11.8°. The obliquity factor for the first two TVLs averaged 27.9° + 5.0°, again, except for 10 MV in lead where the value was 15.0°. Conclusions: The calculated TVLs for obliquely incident scattered radiation are less than those given in NCRP ♯151. This implies that use of an obliquity factor for scattered radiation is appropriate, but that the angle is less than the nominal 30°. This could well be due to the solid angle subtended by the scattered beam at the detector that would energetically favor lower angles.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here