Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐12: A Fluence‐Based Algorithm for MU Calculation of Proton Beams
Author(s) -
Zhu TC,
Li Z,
Karunamuni R,
Yeung D,
Slopsema Roelf
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2760657
Subject(s) - sobp , proton therapy , fluence , monitor unit , imaging phantom , radius , proton , physics , optics , cyclotron , scattering , beam (structure) , detector , nuclear medicine , nuclear physics , computer science , medicine , laser , plasma , computer security
Purpose: We have developed an empirical algorithm to calculate patient specific monitor unit (MU) for megavoltage proton beams. Method and Materials: The algorithm is based on a well‐established formula for proton output calculation. 1 It adds additional data for a broad ranges of SSD, depth, off‐axis, snout size, and especially field size defined by the cutout. Pristine percentage depth doses (PDD) of proton beams are used to determine the SOBP PDD using the beam modulation wheel input file. This algorithm adopts the concept of proton head‐scatter factor, H p (s,r,f) , to characterize the proton fluence variation with source‐to‐detector distance ( f ), snout size ( s ), and radius of circular cutout ( r ), which is attributed to the proton scattering in the cyclotron nozzle, snout, and Copper inserts. Results: A new quantity PSF(r) as functions of equivalent beam radius r and depth d , are introduced to account for proton phantom scattering in a water phantom per unit incident fluence. PSF is measured as BF(r)/H(r) , where BF is blocking factor measured as the ratio of dose measured in water at reference depth between a circular field with radius r and an open field, and H p is the ratio of doses measured in air (without any buildup) using a diode detector for the same conditions. Equivalent radius for an arbitrary field can be calculated using a sector‐integration of PSF(r) . PSF is independent of the snout size. Conclusion: This algorithm is ideally suitable for calculating patients‐pecific MU for Monte‐Carlo or pencil‐beam based treatment planning system for protons.