Premium
2D/3D Image fusion for accurate target localization and evaluation of a mask based stereotactic system in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of cranial lesions
Author(s) -
Jin JianYue,
Ryu Samuel,
Faber Kathleen,
Mikkelsen Tom,
Chen Qing,
Li Shidong,
Movsas Benjamin
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2392605
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , radiosurgery , reproducibility , stereotactic radiotherapy , nuclear medicine , image guided radiation therapy , medical imaging , medicine , radiation therapy , radiology , mathematics , statistics
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a two‐dimensional (2D) to three‐dimensional (3D) image‐fusion‐guided target localization system and a mask based stereotactic system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) of cranial lesions. A commercial x‐ray image guidance system originally developed for extracranial radiosurgery was used for FSRT of cranial lesions. The localization accuracy was quantitatively evaluated with an anthropomorphic head phantom implanted with eight small radiopaque markers (BBs) in different locations. The accuracy and its clinical reliability were also qualitatively evaluated for a total of 127 fractions in 12 patients with both kV x‐ray images and MV portal films. The image‐guided system was then used as a standard to evaluate the overall uncertainty and reproducibility of the head mask based stereotactic system in these patients. The phantom study demonstrated that the maximal random error of the image‐guided target localization was ± 0.6 mm in each direction in terms of the 95% confidence interval (CI). The systematic error varied with measurement methods. It was approximately 0.4 mm , mainly in the longitudinal direction, for the kV x‐ray method. There was a 0.5 mm systematic difference, primarily in the lateral direction, between the kV x‐ray and the MV portal methods. The patient study suggested that the accuracy of the image‐guided system in patients was comparable to that in the phantom. The overall uncertainty of the mask system was ± 4 mm , and the reproducibility was ± 2.9 mm in terms of 95% CI. The study demonstrated that the image guidance system provides accurate and precise target positioning.