Premium
Po‐Thur Eve General‐34: Normalized data for the estimation of fetal radiation dose from radiotherapy of the breast
Author(s) -
Osei E,
Bradley B,
Fleck A,
Darko J
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2244661
Subject(s) - medicine , fetus , gestational age , pregnancy , radiation therapy , ionizing radiation , obstetrics , abdomen , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , radiological weapon , radiology , irradiation , physics , genetics , nuclear physics , biology
There can be several reasons why a pregnant patient may receive a radiological examination. It could have been a planned exposure or may have resulted from an emergency when a thorough evaluation of pregnancy was impractical or the pregnancy was unsuspected during the examination. With younger women being diagnosed with breast cancer, the likelihood of the later will increase in the radiotherapy departments. Whatever the reason, when presented with a pregnant patient who has been exposed to ionizing radiation, the dose to the fetus should be assessed. However, a major source of uncertainty in the estimation of fetal dose is the influence of fetal size and position as these changes with gestational age. We have investigated doses to the fetus from radiotherapy of the breast of a pregnant patient using an anthropomorphic phantom. Data for estimating fetal dose that takes into account the size and depth within the maternal abdomen for different treatment techniques have been provided. The data indicate that fetal dose is dependent on both depth and gestational age and hence these factors should always be considered when estimating dose. The data shows that dose can be underestimated up to about 10% or overestimated up to about 30% if the dose to the uterus is assumed instead of the actual fetal dose. It can also be underestimated up to about 23% or overestimated up to about 12% if a mean depth of 9cm is assumed, instead of using the actual depth of the fetus within the maternal abdomen.