z-logo
Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐417: The Effect of Target Volume Depth On Surface Dose for Inverse Planned IMRT Treatments of Head and Neck Cancers
Author(s) -
Parker W,
Poli E,
Evans M,
Campos L Lucente,
Podgorsak E
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2241336
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , medicine , multileaf collimator , dosimetry , head and neck , supine position , radiation therapy , radiation treatment planning , radiology , surgery
This work evaluates the surface dose as a function of PTV proximity to the surface for inverse planned head‐and‐neck IMRT patients and compares the results to measurements performed for a conventional treatment technique. Methods and Materials: An anthropomorphic phantom was CT scanned in the supine treatment position with thermoplastic mask immobilization covering the entire head‐and‐neck excluding the supra‐clavicular region. A CTV including the cervical, low neck, and supra‐clavicular lymph nodes, as well a 5 mm margin was outlined. Inverse IMRT plans were generated using a 7 field coplanar technique with 6 MV photons. Plans were created for PTVs defined at 0, 5, and, 10 mm depth from the phantom surface (PTV skin , PTV 5 , PTV 10 ). The treatments were delivered using a dynamic multileaf collimator sliding window technique. Measurements at up to 8 locations on the surface of the phantom and at 2 locations near the center of the PTVs were performed using TLD and MOSFET dosimeters. Results were compared to measurements performed for a conventional 3‐field geometry (opposed laterals and anterior supra‐clavicular field planned to cover the PTV skin ). Results: and Discussion: The average surface dose for the IMRT plans in the neck region was measured to be 59%, 78%, and 92% of the prescription dose for the PTV 10 , PTV 5 , and PTV skin plans respectively, and likewise, 53%, 55%, and 73%, respectively in the supra‐clavicular region. Average surface doses from the conventional field arrangement were measured to be 100% and 36% of the prescription dose for the neck and supra‐clavicular region respectively. Conclusion: For the IMRT plans the surface dose increased as a function of the PTV proximity to the surface. For an equivalent prescription dose, the conventional 3‐field technique yielded a higher average skin dose in the neck region and lower dose in the supraclavicular region in comparison with the IMRT plans.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here