Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐316: Measured and Calculated Dose Distribution Around 125I Brachytherapy Seeds in a Breast Phantom
Author(s) -
Bertrand MJ,
Reniers B,
Verhaegen F
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2241234
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , monte carlo method , materials science , brachytherapy , photon , acrylic resin , significant difference , biomedical engineering , nuclear medicine , physics , optics , mathematics , radiation therapy , medicine , composite material , radiology , statistics , coating
Purpose: To compare measurement with Gafchromic® EBT films and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations of the dose distribution around LDR brachytherapy 125 I seeds in a breast phantom and to analyze the effect of tissue elemental composition. Method: MC simulations of IBt Interseed 125 seeds were performed, using MCNP4C. In view of the low energy of the photons, the detailed physics treatment was used, with libraries from EPDL97 and no electron transport. In order to evaluate the perturbation of the film, simulations were carried out to compare the dose distributions in the film and in water or acrylic. The radial dose function of tissues and potential substitutes were determined using MC and compared to associate the best substitute to the desired tissue. Measurements for 5 seeds in an acrylic breast phantom were performed and compared with the MC simulations for the same geometry. Results: Our simulations show no significant differences between dose distributions calculated in films and in water (average difference 0.13%). Similar results can be observed for simulations in acrylic. The radial dose function of acrylic is very close to the one of breast tissue (2/3 mammal gland, 1/3 fat). However, there is a significant difference in the dose distributions in acrylic and water (average 7%, maximum 25%). The comparison between the measurements in the acrylic phantom and the calculations shows a good agreement between the isodose distributions (within 12%). Conclusion: Both in water and in acrylic, EBT films appear to introduce no significant perturbation to the measured dose distribution around 125 I LDR brachytherapy seeds. These films are very useful tools for measurements around 125 I seeds. There is a significant tissue composition effect that should be taken into account in LDR brachytherapy dosimetry. Acrylic appears to be the best substitute for breast tissue. Seeds furnished by IBt.