Contrast‐detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography

In this paper we performed a contrast detail analysis of three commercially available flat panel detectors, two based on the indirect detection mechanism (GE Revolution XQ/i, system A, and Trixell/Philips Pixium 4600, system B) and one based on the direct detection mechanism (Hologic DirectRay DR 1000, system C). The experiment was conducted using standard x‐ray radiation quality and a widely used contrast‐detail phantom. Images were evaluated using a four alternative forced choice paradigm on a diagnostic‐quality softcopy monitor. At the low and intermediate exposures, systems A and B gave equivalent performances. At the high dose levels, system A performed better than system B in the entire range of target sizes, even though the pixel size of system A was about 40% larger than that of system B. At all the dose levels, the performances of the system C (direct system) were lower than those of system A and B (indirect systems). Theoretical analyses based on the Perception Statistical Model gave similar predictedSNR Tvalues corresponding to an observer efficiency of about 0.08 for systems A and B and 0.05 for system C.