Premium
Sci‐AM2 Sat ‐ 01: A novel geometric analysis for beam angle optimization in 3D‐CRT based on target conformity
Author(s) -
Potrebko P,
McCurdy B
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.2031051
Subject(s) - orientation (vector space) , polygon (computer graphics) , beam (structure) , mathematics , nuclear medicine , optics , geometry , computer science , physics , medicine , telecommunications , frame (networking)
In radiotherapy, the primary goal is to deliver high dose to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. For maximum radiation conformity to the PTV, one tries to achieve an extremely sharp dose gradient around the PTV. In this work, we have conducted a fundamental geometrical analysis of the PTV to explore the concept of geometrically inferring the preferred location of sharp dose gradients. To achieve this, the polygonal surface mesh data of the PTV was extracted from the Pinnacle 3 treatment planning system and the surface normal of each polygon composing the PTV surface mesh was computed. Vectors describing the source/isocentre orientation of every possible couch and gantry combination were pre‐computed. If the polygon surface normal and the gantry‐couch vector were perpendicular, then the area of that polygon was cumulatively stored at the gantry‐couch combination. This beam orientation would then allow a beam to be aligned parallel to that particular surface of the PTV in order to produce a sharp dose gradient between the PTV and surrounding tissue. Optimal beam orientations were inferred from gantry‐couch combinations that were parallel to the largest cumulative area of PTV polygons. The algorithm was implemented on a cohort of prostate, lung, and head‐and‐neck patients. Optimal beam orientations for target conformity are presented for coplanar geometry, in order to simplify comparison to clinical beam configurations. This is the first work based on a geometric analysis of the PTV surface to demonstrate the 4‐field box configuration as an optimal orientation for prostate radiotherapy.