Premium
TU‐E‐I‐611‐06: A Novel Shielding System That May Eliminate the Need for Lead Apparel During Fluoroscopic Procedures
Author(s) -
McCormick V,
Goldstein J,
O”Neill W,
Pica M
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1998420
Subject(s) - shields , imaging phantom , electromagnetic shielding , lead apron , enclosure , radiation protection , shield , fluoroscopy , nuclear medicine , lead (geology) , medicine , biomedical engineering , materials science , engineering , electrical engineering , radiology , composite material , petrology , geomorphology , geology
Purpose: To demonstrate the effectiveness of a novel shielding system that completely shields the operator and attending staff during fluoroscopic procedures. Materials and Methods: The enclosure system, developed by ECLS, Inc., is composed of lead glass, leaded drapes and a steel frame. Most of the patient's body and the x‐ray unit are on one side of the enclosure. The leaded glass and leaded drapes contain 1 mm and 0.5 mm lead equivalency, respectively. All exposure measurements were taken with a Radcal 9010 survey instrument with a 60cc ion chamber. The scatter phantom was composed of 7 inches of Acrylic and 3 mm Aluminum. Measurements were taken at various positions in the room during boosted fluoroscopy. Measurements were also taken within a lead apron, with 0.5 mm lead equivalency, at 2 ft from phantom with no interposed shielding. Results: The maximum exposure rate was measured at the operator position and was 1.9 mR/h, 2.5 ft from the phantom. A corresponding measurement on the phantom side of the shield was 824 mR/h. The maximum exposure rate seen within the lead apron was 13.7 mR/h. The shielding system performed better than the 0.5 mm lead equivalency lead aprons. A staff member standing at the operator's position for all 211 hours of fluoro time last year in that lab would have receive 401 mrem, well below 10% of the legal limit of 5000 mrem whole body allowed for occupational exposure. Conclusion: This shielding system provided protection superior to that of a standard lead apron. It is hoped that the use of this shielding system may eliminate the need for lead apparel during fluoroscopic procedures. Conflicts of Interest: This research is partially funded by ECLS, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom