Premium
SU‐FF‐T‐300: A Comparison of Physical and Virtual Wedges: Measurement of Collimator Scatter with a Miniphantom
Author(s) -
Vadivelu G,
Jacob S
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1998029
Subject(s) - collimator , field size , wedge (geometry) , physics , optics , radiation , linear particle accelerator , dosimetry , field (mathematics) , beam (structure) , materials science , nuclear medicine , mathematics , medicine , pure mathematics
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the Collimator Scatter Factor S c for Physical Wedge (PW) fields and Virtual Wedge (VW) fields with a miniphantom and to compare them. Method and Materials: Measurements were performed on a linear accelerator producing 6 MV and 18 MV x‐rays. Data were collected from field size 4×4 cm 2 to 25×25 cm 2 and all measurements were done with miniphantom at extended SSDs and the effect of SSD on S c was evaluated. Results: It is observed that the S c values for PW fields are always higher than those of VW fields. However, for smaller field sizes upto 10×10 cm 2 , the difference in S c between PW and VW almost does not exist for all wedges. For field sizes greater than 10×10 cm 2 the difference increases with field size and upto 45° wedge angle. The maximum difference of about 3.5% occurs at 45° wedge angle for larger field size in both energies. Conclusion: The SSD has negligible effect on S c for both PW and VW fields. S c values for PW fields are always higher than that of VW fields are probably due to the general notion that PW in the beam act as additional extended source of scatter radiation. While there is a significant difference in S c values for 45° wedge for larger field size, there is negligible difference for smaller field sizes upto 10×10 cm 2 for all the wedge angles in both energies. It is most likely due to scattered radiation from the irradiated wedge volume that increases with the field. It is further observed that for PW, the scatter increases with the wedge thickness at the central axis. The S c values for PW 60° fields are less than those for PW 45° fields due to less wedge thickness at the central axis.