z-logo
Premium
SU‐FF‐I‐16: Calibration of TLD Chips to Maximize Accuracy in Radiographic Phantom Dosimetry
Author(s) -
Ogden K,
Lavallee R,
Huda W,
Roskopf M,
Scalzetti E
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1997496
Subject(s) - thermoluminescent dosimeter , dosimetry , imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , calibration , protocol (science) , radiography , medicine , biomedical engineering , materials science , mathematics , dosimeter , surgery , statistics , alternative medicine , pathology
Purpose: To develop an efficient annealing/readout protocol for TLD dosimetry that will maximize the accuracy and precision in radiographic dosimetry measurements. Method and Materials: 500 TLD chips were grouped in batches of 100 and subjected to varying annealing protocols and then irradiated to varying exposure levels. Three different annealing/readout protocols were tested. In protocol ♯1, the chips were annealed at 400 C for 1 hour followed by 2 hours at 100 C. The chips were exposed, and then allowed to rest for 24 hours before reading. In protocol ♯2, the anneal cycle was 400 C for 1 hour followed with a 30 minute cool‐down, followed by 20 hours at 80 C. Immediately after exposure, the TLD's were heated to 120 C for 10 minutes, then read. In protocol ♯3, the anneal cycle was 400 C for 1 hour followed by a 30 minute cool‐down, then 100 C for 2 hours. After exposure, the TLDs were pre‐heated and read as in protocol ♯2. Results: For protocol ♯1, the inter‐exposure uncertainty in the response (nC/mR) was approximately 4.2%. Using protocol ♯2, the intra‐batch uncertainty was reduced to 4.0%, and for protocol ♯3 the uncertainty was reduced to ∼3.7%. By using individual chip calibrations, the intra‐batch uncertainty for estimating consecutive exposures was reduced to 3.5%, 1.8%, and 1.7% for protocols ♯1, 2, and 3, respectively. By binning TLD signals over groups of 3 chips, the uncertainty in estimating exposures was reduced to ∼1.1% for protocol ♯3. Conclusion: With careful calibration and binning of results, an accuracy approaching 1% is readily obtained. The anneal/readout protocol that yielded the highest accuracy also required the least time for a complete cycle, with a batch of 100 chips being processed in <1 working day using a single furnace for annealing and a single‐chip reader.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom