Premium
SU‐EE‐A2‐05: Accuracy in the Determination of Microcalcification Thickness in Digital Mammography
Author(s) -
Brandan ME,
Grabski V
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1997457
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , microcalcification , mammography , optics , detector , materials science , digital mammography , physics , medicine , cancer , breast cancer
Purpose: To study the factors which affect the accuracy of the microcalcification (MC) thickness determination in digital mammography, in particular, the contribution from scattered radiation. Method and Materials: The effect of scattered radiation on the accuracy of a MC thickness reconstruction has been studied using simulation. The GEANT4 code, assuming a scanning beam geometry, has been used to simulate photon transport through a tissue‐like flat phantom containing 0.2–1.0 mm thick cylindrical MC and a pixelized detector (100 microns side). The influence of detector resolution has been analyzed by the simulation of small spherical MC embedded into the phantom. Background has been determined by a fitting technique for the signal/background description, using a Gaussian‐like expression for the first, and a polynomial for the second. Measurements were carried out using a GE Senographe 2000D unit. Results: Our results indicate the possibility of reconstructing the MC thickness with accuracy of the order of 12.5%, including background, position and simulation uncertainties, when a 3 mm wide beam is used. The transversal size reconstruction for cylindrical MC having diameters larger than 1 mm, is of the order of 5%. Thickness reconstruction is found to be an alternative to signal to noise ratio for microcalcification detection. Conclusion: These simulations indicate that the thickness of dense objects larger than about 150 microns can be reconstructed using a digital mammography unit having 100 micron pixels and exposures equivalent to 1.5 mGy mean glandular dose.