Premium
Validation of dynamic MLC‐controller log files using a two‐dimensional diode array
Author(s) -
Li Jonathan G.,
Dempsey James F.,
Ding Li,
Liu Chihray,
Palta Jatinder R.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1567951
Subject(s) - collimator , linear particle accelerator , quality assurance , multileaf collimator , computer science , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , intensity modulation , medical physics , physics , optics , medicine , beam (structure) , external quality assessment , pathology , phase modulation , phase noise
Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered with multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) in the step‐and‐shoot mode uses multiple static MLC segments to achieve intensity modulation. For typical IMRT treatment plans, significant numbers of segments are delivered with monitor units (MUs) of much less than 10. Verification of the ability of the linear accelerator (linac) to deliver small MU segments accurately is an important step in the IMRT commissioning and quality assurance (QA) process. Recent studies have reported large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs. These discrepancies could potentially cause large errors in the delivered patient dose. We have undertaken a systematic study to evaluate the accuracy of the dynamic MLC log files, which are created automatically by our commercial MLC workstation after each delivery, in recording the fractional MU delivered in the step‐and‐shoot mode. Two linac models were evaluated with simple‐geometry leaf sequences and delivered with different total MUs and different nominal dose rates. A commercial two‐dimensional diode array was used for the measurement. Large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs were found. The discrepancies were larger for small MU segments at higher dose rate, with some small MU segments completely undelivered. The recorded fractional MUs in the log files were found to agree with what was delivered within the limits of our experimental uncertainty. Our results indicate that it is important to verify the delivery accuracy of small MU segments that could potentially occur in a patient treatment and that the log files are useful in checking the integrity of the linac delivery once validated. Thus validated log files can be used as a QA tool for general IMRT delivery and patient‐specific plan verification.