Premium
A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen‐film mammograms
Author(s) -
Pawluczyk Olga,
Augustine Bindu J.,
Yaffe Martin J.,
Rico Dan,
Yang Jiwei,
Mawdsley Gordon E.,
Boyd Norman F.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1539038
Subject(s) - mammography , imaging phantom , calibration , materials science , wedge (geometry) , biomedical engineering , optics , breast cancer , medicine , mathematics , physics , cancer , statistics
A method is described for the quantitative volumetric analysis of the mammographic density (VBD) from digitized screen‐film mammograms. The method is based on initial calibration of the imaging system with a tissue‐equivalent plastic device and the subsequent correction for variations in exposure factors and film processing characteristics through images of an aluminum step wedge placed adjacent to the breast during imaging. From information about the compressed breast thickness and technique factors used for taking the mammogram as well as the information from the calibration device, VBD is calculated. First, optical sensitometry is used to convert images to Log relative exposure. Second, the images are corrected for x‐ray field inhomogeneity using a spherical section PMMA phantom image. The effectiveness of using the aluminum step wedge in tracking down the variations in exposure factors and film processing was tested by taking test images of the calibration device, aluminum step wedge and known density phantoms at various exposure conditions and also at different times over one year. Results obtained on known density phantoms show that VBD can be estimated to within 5% accuracy from the actual value. A first order thickness correction is employed to correct for inaccuracy in the compression thickness indicator of the mammography units. Clinical studies are ongoing to evaluate whether VBD can be a better indicator for breast cancer risk.