Premium
IMRT verification by three‐dimensional dose reconstruction from portal beam measurements
Author(s) -
Partridge M.,
Ebert M.,
Hesse BM.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1494988
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , beam (structure) , fluence , radiation treatment planning , medical imaging , iterative reconstruction , physics , optics , radiation therapy , computer science , medicine , radiology , artificial intelligence , laser
A method of reconstructing three‐dimensional, in vivo dose distributions delivered by intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is presented. A proof‐of‐principle experiment is described where an inverse‐planned IMRT treatment is delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom. The exact position of the phantom at the time of treatment is measured by acquiring megavoltage CT data with the treatment beam and a research prototype, flat‐panel, electronic portal imaging device. Immediately following CT imaging, the planned IMRT beams are delivered using the multiple‐static field technique. The delivered fluence is sampled using the same detector as for the CT data. The signal measured by the portal imaging device is converted to primary fluence using an iterative phantom‐scatter estimation technique. This primary fluence is back‐projected through the previously acquired megavoltage CT model of the phantom, with inverse attenuation correction, to yield an input fluence map. The input fluence maps are used to calculate a “reconstructed” dose distribution using the same convolution/superposition algorithm as for the original planning dose calculation. Both relative and absolute dose reconstructions are shown. For the relative measurements, individual beam weights are taken from measurements but the total dose is normalized at the reference point. The absolute dose reconstructions do not use any dosimetric information from the original plan. Planned and reconstructed dose distributions are compared, with the reconstructed relative dose distribution also being compared to film measurements.