Premium
Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom
Author(s) -
Hartmann Siantar C. L.,
Walling R. S.,
Daly T. P.,
Faddegon B.,
Albright N.,
Bergstrom Paul,
Bielajew A. F.,
Chuang C.,
Garrett D.,
House R. K.,
Knapp D.,
Wieczorek D. J.,
Verhey L. J.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1381551
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , imaging phantom , dosimetry , physics , monitor unit , linear particle accelerator , multileaf collimator , photon , beam (structure) , collimator , backscatter (email) , optics , normalization (sociology) , computational physics , nuclear medicine , medical physics , computer science , statistics , mathematics , medicine , telecommunications , wireless , sociology , anthropology
PEREGRINE is a three‐dimensional Monte Carlo dose calculation system written specifically for radiotherapy. This paper describes the implementation and overall dosimetric accuracy of PEREGRINE physics algorithms, beam model, and beam commissioning procedure. Particle‐interaction data, tracking geometries, scoring, variance reduction, and statistical analysis are described. The BEAM code system is used to model the treatment‐independent accelerator head, resulting in the identification of primary and scattered photon sources and an electron contaminant source. The magnitude of the electron source is increased to improve agreement with measurements in the buildup region in the largest fields. Published measurements provide an estimate of backscatter on monitor chamber response. Commissioning consists of selecting the electron beam energy, determining the scale factor that defines dose per monitor unit, and describing treatment‐dependent beam modifiers. We compare calculations with measurements in a water phantom for open fields, wedges, blocks, and a multileaf collimator for 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac 2100C photon beams. All calculations are reported as dose per monitor unit. Aside from backscatter estimates, no additional, field‐specific normalization is included in comparisons with measurements. Maximum discrepancies were less than either 2% of the maximum dose or 1.2 mm in isodose position for all field sizes and beam modifiers.