Premium
Magnetic fields with photon beams: Monte Carlo calculations for a model magnetic field
Author(s) -
Jette David
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.1326447
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , physics , imaging phantom , photon , beam (structure) , magnetic field , electron , dosimetry , transverse plane , percentage depth dose curve , photon energy , atomic physics , optics , computational physics , nuclear physics , ionization chamber , nuclear medicine , ionization , ion , medicine , statistics , mathematics , structural engineering , engineering , quantum mechanics
Strong transverse magnetic fields can produce very large dose enhancements and reductions in localized regions of a patient under irradiation by a photon beam. We have suggested a model magnetic field which can be expected to produce such large dose enhancements and reductions, and we have carried out EGS4 Monte Carlo calculations to examine this effect for a 6×6 cm 2 photon beam of energy 15, 30, or 45 MV penetrating a water phantom. Our model magnetic field has a nominal (center) strength B 0ranging between 1 and 5 T, and a maximum strength within the geometric beam which is2.2 × B 0 . For all three beam energies, there is significant dose enhancement for B 0= 2 T which increases greatly for B 0= 3 T , but stronger magnetic fields increase the enhancement further only for the 45‐MV beam. Correspondingly, there is major reduction in the dose just distal to this region of large dose enhancement, resulting from secondary electrons and positrons originating upstream which are depositing energy in the dose‐enhancement region rather than continuing further into the patient. The dose peak region is fairly narrow (in depth), but the magnetic field can be shifted along the longitudinal axis to produce a flat peak region of medium width (∼2 cm) or of large width (∼4 cm), with rapid dose dropoffs on either side. For the 30‐MV beam with B 0= 3 T , we found a dose enhancement of 55% for the narrow‐width configuration, 32% for the medium‐width configuration, and 23% for the large‐width configuration; for the 45‐MV beam with B 0= 3 T , the enhancements were quite similar, but for the 15‐MV beam they were considerably less. For all of these 30‐MV configurations, the dose reductions were ∼30%, and they were ∼40% for the 45‐MV configurations.