z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Foreword to BIOMATH 2017 Proceedings: Some comments on mathematical modelling and biomathematics.
Author(s) -
Jacek Banasiak
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
texts in biomathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2603-3046
pISSN - 2603-3038
DOI - 10.11145/texts.2018.06.107
Subject(s) - mesopotamia , greeks , natural (archaeology) , indian subcontinent , natural science , china , ancient egypt , ancient history , classics , mathematics , history , epistemology , philosophy , archaeology
Both biology and mathematics have existed as well established branches of science for hundreds of years and both, maybe not in a well defined way, have been with the humankind for a couple of thousands of years.  Though nature  was studied by the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indian subcontinent and China, the origins of modern biology are typically traced back to the ancient Greece, where Aristotle (384-322 BC) contributed most extensively to its development. Similarly,  the  ancient Babylonians were able to solve quadratic equation over four millennia ago and we can see the development of mathematical methods in all ancient civilisations, notably in China and on the Indian subcontinent. However, possibly again the Greeks were the first who studied mathematics for its own sake, as a collection of abstract objects and relations between them.  Nevertheless, despite the fact that the development  of such a mathematics has not required any external stimuli, an amazing feature of the human mind is that a large number of abstract mathematical constructs has proved to be very well suited for describing natural phenomena.This prompted Eugene Wigner to write his famous article The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences,  ...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here