Open AccessMental health, coloniality and fieldwork in the European university: a reflection in three challenges – commentary to Taylor
Author(s) -
Lioba Hirsch
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
fennia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.346
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1798-5617
pISSN - 0015-0010
DOI - 10.11143/fennia.90763
Subject(s) - ethnography , privilege (computing) , mental health , context (archaeology) , critical reflection , sociology , reflection (computer programming) , field (mathematics) , reading (process) , gender studies , pedagogy , political science , psychology , law , history , anthropology , psychiatry , mathematics , archaeology , computer science , pure mathematics , programming language
In this reflection piece, I discuss three challenges to the way we think about fieldwork and mental health in the context of European universities. These challenges emerged out of reading and reflecting on Stephen Taylor’s paper “The long shadows cast by the field: violence, trauma and the ethnographic researcher”. Specifically I reflect on coloniality and whiteness and the ways in which I consider them to be entangled in both the problem and the discussion around universities’ handling of the mental health of their staff and students. In doing so I rely on decolonial and critical whiteness literature to argue that universities’ disregard for the (mental health) risks associated with conducting ethnographic fieldwork as well as the academic culture which fuels this disregard, reveal the ways in which universities and the knowledge they produce privilege whiteness.