Premium
Charge at the lidocaine binding site residue Phe‐1759 affects permeation in human cardiac voltage‐gated sodium channels
Author(s) -
McNulty Megan M.,
Edgerton Gabrielle B.,
Shah Ravi D.,
Hanck Dorothy A.,
Fozzard Harry A.,
Lipkind Gregory M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.130161
Subject(s) - chemistry , permeation , sodium channel , biophysics , batrachotoxin , membrane potential , electrostatics , stereochemistry , membrane , sodium , biochemistry , organic chemistry , biology
Our homology molecular model of the open/inactivated state of the Na + channel pore predicts, based on extensive mutagenesis data, that the local anaesthetic lidocaine docks eccentrically below the selectivity filter, such that physical occlusion is incomplete. Electrostatic field calculations suggest that the drug's positively charged amine produces an electrostatic barrier to permeation. To test the effect of charge at this pore level on permeation in hNa V 1.5 we replaced Phe‐1759 of domain IVS6, the putative binding site for lidocaine's alkylamino end, with positively and negatively charged residues as well as the neutral cysteine and alanine. These mutations eliminated use‐dependent lidocaine block with no effect on tonic/rested state block. Mutant whole cell currents were kinetically similar to wild type (WT). Single channel conductance (γ) was reduced from WT in both F1759K (by 38%) and F1759R (by 18%). The negatively charged mutant F1759E increased γ by 14%, as expected if the charge effect were electrostatic, although F1759D was like WT. None of the charged mutations affected Na + /K + selectivity. Calculation of difference electrostatic fields in the pore model predicted that lidocaine produced the largest positive electrostatic barrier, followed by lysine and arginine, respectively. Negatively charged glutamate and aspartate both lowered the barrier, with glutamate being more effective. Experimental data were in rank order agreement with the predicted changes in the energy profile. These results demonstrate that permeation rate is sensitive to the inner pore electrostatic field, and they are consistent with creation of an electrostatic barrier to ion permeation by lidocaine's charge.