Premium
The up and down bobbing of human walking: a compromise between muscle work and efficiency
Author(s) -
Massaad Firas,
Lejeune Thierry M.,
Detrembleur Christine
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.127969
Subject(s) - work (physics) , mechanism (biology) , displacement (psychology) , pendulum , mechanical energy , gait , exoskeleton , control theory (sociology) , preferred walking speed , inverted pendulum , power walking , computer science , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physics , mathematics , simulation , psychology , artificial intelligence , medicine , power (physics) , control (management) , quantum mechanics , nonlinear system , psychotherapist , thermodynamics
Human walking has a peculiar straight‐legged style. Consequently, the body's centre of mass (CM) moves up and down with each step, which is noticeable in their up and down head bobbing while walking. This vertical CM movement enables humans to save energy via a pendulum‐like mechanism but is probably a relatively recent locomotor innovation insofar as earliest bipeds may have walked flexed and flat. We investigated the mechanics, energetics, muscle efficiency and optimization of human walking by decreasing and increasing the vertical CM displacement (flat and bouncy walking) in comparison to normal walking at six speeds (1–6 km h −1 ). In both flat and bouncy walking, the pendular mechanism was reduced and the energy cost was increased. However, this increase was unexpectedly much sharper in flat walking where muscles provided normal mechanical work but with a decrease in muscle efficiency. In bouncy walking, muscles provided extra mechanical work in an efficient way. Our results showed that not only do humans bob up and down in normal walking to save energy via a pendulum‐like mechanism but also to make their muscles work efficiently. Actually, walking flat makes the muscles work in unfavourable conditions that waste energy. Furthermore, we are still close to a flat CM displacement relative to our current ability to change this displacement, which suggests that reducing vertical CM displacement is indeed important but only to certain limits. Evolution may ultimately have chosen the best compromise between flat locomotion that requires little work to move and bouncy locomotion that improves muscle efficiency to minimize energy consumption.