Premium
Electromyographic cross‐talk within a compartmentalized muscle of the cat.
Author(s) -
English A W,
Weeks O I
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017763
Subject(s) - compartment (ship) , motor unit , electrophysiology , anatomy , motor unit recruitment , amplitude , electromyography , residence time (fluid dynamics) , chemistry , neuroscience , medicine , physics , biology , geology , oceanography , geotechnical engineering , quantum mechanics
1. Experiments were conducted to test the extent to which the electromyographic (EMG) activity generated by the activation of single motor units is conducted from one neuromuscular compartment of the cat lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle into adjacent compartments. 2. Potentials produced by stimulation of forty‐five single motor units were monitored from bipolar fine‐wire EMG electrodes which had been implanted either into the centres of each of the four neuromuscular compartments of LG or into regions of the muscle known to lie on the border of contiguous compartments. 3. In all cases single unit potentials could be recorded from the electrodes in the centre of the compartments which clearly identified the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. Regardless of unit type, the amplitude of the potential recorded from electrodes in one compartment was always greater than that recorded from any other compartment. 4. Smaller potentials could be recorded from electrodes in the centre of compartments adjacent to the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. For those motor units where the amplitude of the EMG potentials recorded from the compartment of residence was large, the amplitude of such ‘cross‐talk’ could be greater than the amplitude of potentials recorded from the compartment of residence of smaller motor units. 5. In the case of electrodes placed at compartment boundaries, no clear compartment selectivity of recording of motor unit potentials was evident. 6. These results indicate that great care must be taken in choosing sites of EMG electrode placement when performing kinesiological studies, especially when the amplitude of the EMG activity recorded is of consideration.