z-logo
Premium
Voltage‐clamp analysis of a crayfish rectifying synapse.
Author(s) -
Giaume C,
Kado R T,
Korn H
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016524
Subject(s) - crayfish , voltage clamp , synapse , neuroscience , patch clamp , clamp , voltage , biophysics , biology , chemistry , electrophysiology , computer science , electrical engineering , fishery , engineering , clamping , computer vision
1. The rectifying crayfish giant motor synapse has been studied in the second abdominal ganglion, using the double‐voltage‐clamp technique which allowed direct measurements of junctional current at various fixed transjunctional potentials. 2. The transjunctional potential (Vj), defined as the difference between the voltages recorded in the lateral giant axon and the giant motor fibre, was varied from ‐70 to +50 mV, the minimum and maximum junctional chord conductances (gmin and gmax, respectively) were found to be 1.2 +/‐ 1.3 microS (n = 10) and 22.9 +/‐ 6.3 microS (n = 10), respectively. 3. For a given Vj, changes in the lateral giant axon or giant motor fibre membrane potential over a range of +/‐ 30 mV around their resting levels did not influence the junctional permeability (gj), indicating that the inside‐outside potential of the junctional channel does not control gj. 4. Therefore, the steady‐state junctional chord conductances were dependent only upon Vj. 5. The voltage dependence of the chord conductance was well fitted by a modified Boltzmann relation given by the equation (Formula: see text) with the constants: A = 0.15 +/‐ 0.03 mV‐1 (n = 10) and V0 = 28 +/‐ 4 mV (n = 10); the latter two parameters were also found to be independent of both transmembrane potentials. 6. The junctional currents were already constant 1 ms after step changes in the junctional voltage; this was three orders of magnitude faster than the other known examples of voltage‐controlled gap junctions between embryonic cells. 7. Our results may be interpreted by a highly voltage‐dependent probability of opening of the junctional channels. They also suggest that the gap‐junction channels forming the giant motor synapse respond very rapidly to potential and that the hemi‐channels which constitute them may not be symmetric.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here