Premium
Fusimotor reflexes in triceps surae elicited by natural stimulation of muscle afferents from the cat ipsilateral hind limb
Author(s) -
Appelberg B.,
Hulliger M.,
Johansson H.,
Sojka P.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014299
Subject(s) - hindlimb , reflex , stimulation , triceps surae muscle , anatomy , medicine , neuroscience , biology
1. Experiments were performed in forty‐one cats anaesthetized with chloralose. 2. The aim of the study was to investigate whether activity in stretch‐sensitive muscle receptors may cause reflex effects in fusimotor neurones. 3. Activity in fusimotor neurones was studied indirectly by recording from primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents of the triceps surae muscle. The mean rate of firing of the afferents as well as either dynamic index (during ramp extension) or modulation (during sinusoidal extension) was determined. This was done under control conditions, with the posterior biceps—semitendinosus muscles relaxed, and under test conditions, with the same muscles extended. 4. All together, seventy‐one primary afferents were studied quantitatively. Pure or predominantly dynamic effects were observed in twenty‐two, pure or predominantly static effects in nine and no statistically significant effects in forty of the units. Amongst seven secondary afferents studied, two showed weak fusimotor activation, the other five were not influenced. 5. Electrical stimulation of the posterior biceps—semitendinosus or medial gastrocnemius nerves at group II strength was observed to cause dynamic fusimotor reflexes on a number of occasions. 6. The reflex effects observed were, on many occasions, recorded in spinalized preparations. 7. The reflex effects were not accompanied by any detectable e.m.g. activity in triceps, as judged from surface e.m.g. recordings. The reflex effects observed are therefore tentatively ascribed to activation of γ‐motoneurones, yet a contribution from β‐motoneurones cannot wholly be excluded. 8. On the basis of available evidence concerning reflex connexions to γ‐motoneurones from various muscle afferents, it is suggested that the effects observed were caused by activation of muscle spindle secondary endings.