Premium
Monocular activation of visual cortex in normal and monocularly deprived cats: an analysis of evoked potentials.
Author(s) -
Mitzdorf U,
Singer W
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013320
Subject(s) - cats , monocular deprivation , afferent , stimulation , neuroscience , excitatory postsynaptic potential , monocular , sensory deprivation , visual cortex , anatomy , chemistry , medicine , ocular dominance , biology , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , sensory system , physics , optics
The unilaterally induced patterns of prominent excitatory post‐synaptic activity within Areas 17 and 18 were investigated in normal and monocularly deprived cats. They were elicited by electrical stimulation of the optic nerves and evaluated with the one‐dimensional current source‐density method. 1. In Area 18 of normal cats the unilaterally and bilaterally induced current source‐density patterns closely resemble each other. None of the mono‐, di‐ or tri‐synaptic activities is potentiated by binocular convergence. 2. In Area 18 of monocularly deprived cats the synaptic currents elicited by stimulating the nerve on the deprived side lead to approximately the same spatial and temporal distribution of sinks and sources as those induced from the normal eye; but the amplitudes are considerably smaller. This reduction is similar for mono‐, di‐ and trisynaptic responses which indicates (a) that the imbalance between activity from the deprived and non‐deprived eye is mainly due to reduced input to the cortical target cells from the deprived eye and (b) that the activity from the deprived eye still relayed to these cells is passed on to supra‐ and infragranular layers without diminution and in the same way as activity from the normal eye. 3. The imbalance of afferent activity from the deprived and non‐deprived eye is apparent in the evoked potentials recorded from the white matter. This indicates that activity from the deprived eye is already strongly reduced in the thalamo‐cortical fibres. 4. In monocularly deprived, but not in normal cats the monosynaptic activities from the two eyes are often segregated in depth within layer IV. 5. In Area 17 of both normal and deprived cats only a small fraction of the potential monosynaptic activity can be elicited by electrical stimulation of the optic nerves because of transmission failure in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Comparison of the current source‐density patterns elicited from the normal and deprived nerve in monocularly deprived cats indicates that activity produced by fast conducting afferents is more affected (reduced) by deprivation that that conveyed by slower afferents.