Premium
Influence of eye movements on geniculo‐striate excitability in the cat
Author(s) -
Adey W. Ross,
Noda Hiroharu
Publication year - 1973
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010418
Subject(s) - saccadic masking , eye movement , lateral geniculate nucleus , neuroscience , stimulus (psychology) , retina , optic tract , visual cortex , visual field , stimulation , psychology , psychotherapist
1. The excitability of the geniculo‐striate pathway during a saccadic eye movement was studied in alert cats with chronically implanted electrodes. Excitability was assessed by the amplitude of post‐synaptic components of field responses in both lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex to electrical stimulation of the optic chiasm. Modifications in amplitude were evaluated during the period following eye movements, by triggering a stimulator from potential shifts in the electrooculograms and altering delays in the stimulus pulse. 2. The post‐synaptic component of the geniculate response was markedly depressed for about 150 msec, reaching a trough at approximately 100 msec after the initiation of an eye movement. This effect was dependent on the visual environment and was not observed in complete darkness. A similar depression occurred when the visual field was abruptly moved by retinal impulses generated by a quick displacement of the image of the visual world associated with an eye movement. The depression reflected a reduction of cellular discharge to the orthodromic volley and hence a suppression of the transmission of visual information through the lateral geniculate nucleus. This may be a mechanism for saccadic suppression. 3. The post‐synaptic components of the cortical response were enhanced for about 200 msec, reaching a peak at approximately 150 msec after the initiation of an eye movement. Although this facilitation occurred also in complete darkness, it did not occur when the visual field was abruptly shifted while the eyes were stationary. The fact that it occurred with eye movements and exclusively in the post‐synaptic components suggests that it was caused by signals from a system closely related to eye movements. This may be a manifestation of the corollary mechanism.