Premium
Modifications of dorsal horn cell activities in the spinal cord, after intra‐arterial injection of bradykinin
Author(s) -
Besson J. M.,
Conseiller C.,
Hamann K.F.,
Maillard MarieClaude
Publication year - 1972
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009748
Subject(s) - lamina , spinal cord , excitatory postsynaptic potential , bradykinin , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , nociception , chemistry , anatomy , cord , medicine , anesthesia , neuroscience , biology , surgery , receptor
1. A method is described to study the modification in the activity of the lamina IV and V cells of the dorsal horn under the intra‐arterial administration of bradykinin into the hind limb of the spinal cat. 2. The modifications induced by intra‐arterial injection of bradykinin preferentially affected the lamina V cells (77% of the units) and produced few changes in the lamina IV cells (16% of the units showed variations). 3. 52% of the lamina V cells were activated; the mean increase in the firing rate was 700%. The mean latency of the effect was 20 sec and the mean duration was 47 sec. However, there was large variance in the excitatory effect across cells. On the other hand, for the same cell, the observed effects were perfectly reproducible and injections of physiological fluid induced no response. 4. 25% of the lamina V cells were inhibited. Generally, the activity of the cell was reduced to 13% of its initial value; in some cases, a total suppression of activity was observed. The mean latency of the inhibitory effect was 12 sec and its duration 28 sec. All these units had a very wide inhibitory field (activated by stimulations of low intensity) which asymmetrically surrounds the excitatory field. 5. This study confirms the role played by the lamina V cells in the transmission of nociceptive messages. The existence of inhibitory phenomena is in favour of the gate control theory described by Melzack & Wall (1965) without deciding the pre‐ or post‐synaptic nature of these mechanisms.